|
Home
Case 6
Cytoindia Home
|
|
| |
| |
| Discussion Case #6 |
|
| |
n
|
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
“Scanty aspirate”
“Negative for tumor?”
n
-
nLarger
than RBC’s
-
nNo
particular feature of malignancy
-
nNo
nucleoli
-
nBut
the N:C ratio is altered
-
nThere
is hyperchromasia
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
-
nAre
they inflammatory cells?
-
nHistiocytes?
-
nEpithelial
cells?
-
-
nWould
it be prudent to ask for a repeat aspirate? Or a FS
-
nClinician
may also be vague about the nature of the ‘lump’
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Tata Memorial Hospital Experience |
|
| |
-
nAnalysis
of 40 cases
n
-
nMany
‘Lob Ca’ aspirates were scanty or too sparse for interpretation
n
-
nOn
review many of our reports were
‘false negative’ cases
n
-
nThe
criteria for malignancy were subtle or virtually non existent
-
nSingly
scattered cells or cells in short chains
-
nNo
nuclear characters of malignancy
-
nNo
nucleoli- sometime grooves seen
-
nClinically
no mammographic findings
-
nOn
palpation- granular feel or hard ill defined vague nodularity
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
Giemsa stain is often more
reassuring |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Diagnosis Lobular
Carcinoma |
|